<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Python on Chris Zeng</title>
    <link>https://chris-zeng.pages.dev/tags/python/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Python on Chris Zeng</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://chris-zeng.pages.dev/tags/python/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>FIFA World Cup Result Predictor</title>
      <link>https://chris-zeng.pages.dev/posts/nutmeg/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://chris-zeng.pages.dev/posts/nutmeg/</guid>
      <description>I built a soccer Elo model, put it in your browser, and then spent most of my effort trying to prove it could beat the bookmaker&amp;rsquo;s closing line. It can&amp;rsquo;t — and watching it fail taught me more about betting markets than any win would have.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Indicator Graveyard</title>
      <link>https://chris-zeng.pages.dev/posts/indicator-graveyard/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://chris-zeng.pages.dev/posts/indicator-graveyard/</guid>
      <description>Twenty-five Pine strategy files, dozens of indicators, and almost none of them were wrong. They were real patterns that didn&amp;rsquo;t survive a different window, a realistic cost, or an honest question about where the money came from. A catalog of how each one fooled me — sorted by failure mode, not by indicator.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zero Alpha</title>
      <link>https://chris-zeng.pages.dev/posts/zero-alpha/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://chris-zeng.pages.dev/posts/zero-alpha/</guid>
      <description>My backtest showed +121.82% in three months, beating buy-and-hold. I spent real money — and a purpose-built validation pipeline — finding out whether that was real. It wasn&amp;rsquo;t. Proving it was the best engineering work in the project.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
